![]() |
| The winner: Ingrid Bergman and Gösta Ekman |
I decided to re-view the 1939 American version of Intermezzo after moderately enjoying the 1936 Swedish version. Both films feature Ingrid Bergman, the later Selznick production was her American film debut. The scenario is standard romantic tripe: an aging violinist falls in love with a comely young pianist. He leaves wife and kids and the new duo make beautiful music together, but this idyll cannot last and the violinist returns to home and hearth. Both films did boffo biz at the box office. I prefer the original, but the American version has its merits.
The American version clocks in at 70 minutes while the original version is some twenty minutes longer. The American version therefore is not as slavish a rendition as Algiers was of Pépé le Moko. 👷 George O'Neil, who adapted the earlier Molander/Ekman script, rightly jettisoned some material, but the remake seems truncated. The Swedish version has more music, though many scenes are verbatim. An early scene in the 1939 film between the violinist Holgar Brandt (Leslie Howard) and his missus (Edna Best) has a few distracting jump cuts that makes one believe a page or two of dialogue was tossed. Similarly the American version excises most of the first twenty minutes of the Swedish version which focuses on the retirement of Brandt's musical partner.
The American version boasts better production values. The 1939 film substitutes a nice faux Riviera village for the Swiss one of 1936. The cinematography of Gregg Toland gives the American film's close-ups a luxe feel. Ms. Bergman glows with an inner mounting flame in both films, but her English dialogue is a little slushy. The supporting casts of both films are very good, but the 1939 film's making Brandt's son younger displays its tendency towards sentimentalizing the material. That sentimentality extends to the use of the Brandt's family dog who is given a bigger role in the later version with lots of comic reaction shots. The use of the pooch as a totem of fido fidelity is beyond the ken of the filmmakers.
The direction in both films, by Gustaf Molander and Gregory Ratoff respectively, is stolid and unremarkable. The trump card for the Swedish version is its Holgar Brandt. I like Leslie Howard well enough, particularly in The Scarlet Pimpernel. However, his matinee idol charm sometimes strikes me as wan and wooden. That's why he was so well cast as Ashley Wilkes. However, the role of Holger Brandt requires a dark charisma that was beyond Mr. Howard. And after all, the role was made for and by Gösta Ekman. He possessed the grandiose and saturnine qualities required, being the continental equivalent of John Barrymore. Like Barrymore, his greatest triumphs were on the stage where he played roles by Shakespeare, Ibsen, Strindberg, and Shaw. His film appearances were more limited, but include the title role in the greatest silent film of them all, Murnau's Faust. Sadly, both Ekman and Howard (and Gregg Toland) would be dead by 1945.👷 One day I will tackle Gaslight vs. Gaslight. I'm a George Cukor fan, but Thorold Dickinson is under appreciated.





