Ivan's Childhood

Nickolai Burlyayev and Evgeny Zharikov

Andrei Tarkovsky's Ivan's Childhood, from 1962, is a striking debut feature. The film is set, primarily, in the western USSR during World War 2. The main character is a twelve year old orphan who seeks vengeance against the invading Germans by joining the partisans. His thirst for revenge is so great that he has escaped a boarding school he was put into to serve at the front. The film shifts back and forth between Ivan's experiences during the war contrasted with memories, dreams, and reflections of Ivan's peaceful and pastorale past. 

The landscape of the warfront is ravaged and macabre, an alienated environment. Ivan's Childhood has some of the standard elements of a Soviet film about what they still call The Great Patriotic War, but films by Tarkovsky look like no other. The full panoply of nature is always on display: from fertility to destruction, but shot as if by a metaphysical poet. Tarkovsky and cinematographer Vadim Yusov's compositions are always beautiful, but they are also disorienting. The vastness of the natural world, whether on earth or in space, is overwhelming for his characters. The images in Ivan's Childhood, whether they be of a crashed plane or a truck hauling apples in the rain. are defamiliarized. Tarkovsky's style is similar to the concept of Ostranenie or "making strange", as coined by Victor Shklovsky. The palpable textures of the imagery in Ivan's Childhood follow Shklovsky's dictum that in art "a stone must be stony."

Burlyayev and Irma Raush

Alas, film is more than the sum of its images, for some elements of the film's screenplay succumb to trite cliches. The barely sketched love triangle feels more like a commercial concession than a necessary element. Also, Ivan's devotion to the cause feels too super human. It is this element that led Jonas Mekas to denounce the flick in the Village Voice as "a fascist movie." Now Mekas, who was born in Lithuania and was imprisoned by the Nazis for his troubles, may have been overly sensitive when he encountered propaganda produced in countries headed by authoritarian regimes, but that was his right. Ivan's Childhood originated as a short story by Vladimir Bogomolov. It went through many iterations on its way to the big screen. Bogomolov was involved at every stage and there was much wrangling over the scenario. Future filmmaker Andrei Konchalovsky, who plays a bespectacled soldier, was one of the many credited and uncredited screenwriters.

                                                               Spoiler Alert

The prime bone of contention during production was over the film's ending and I admit I have some misgiving over the final sequence. In the original story, Ivan survives the war. In the film, a Lieutenant who had befriended him finds his file, which indicates Ivan has been executed for being a partisan, while rummaging through the Nazi chancellory in defeated Berlin. Afterwards, we are treated to shots of torture devices used by the Gestapo. Shots from Soviet documentary units of Berlin in ruins feel tacked on as does ghoulish footage of the charred remains of Joseph Goebbels and the corpses of his children, poisoned by Goebbels and his Frau. It didn't sit well with me and I imagine the same was true with Mr. Mekas. Still, Ivan's Childhood has many moments that foretell an extraordinary career from Tarkovsky.

The actor who played Ivan, Nickolai Burlyayev, has subsequently had a successful film and political career. He was at one time married to Natalya Bondarchuk, daughter of Sergei Bondarchuk and Inna Makarova. After publicly supporting Russia's incursion into Ukraine in 2014, he successfully ran for the Duma in 2020. He has described himself as Orthodox and a homophobe. He has been sanctioned by both the UK government and the US treasury. Making strange indeed. 

Nouvelle Vague

Zoey Deutch and Guillaume Marbeck

I found Richard Linklater's Nouvelle Vague to be a charming, frisky, and light on its feet tribute to the French New Wave. The film focuses on Jean-Luc Godard's struggle to direct his first feature, Breathless. The script, written by a cohort of writers, places Godard within the ferment of the Cahiers du Cinéma magazine in which Godard and his fellow critics (especially Truffaut, Chabrol, Rivette, and Rohmer) formulated la politiques des auteurs. That critical stance became known, in English, as the auteur theory which is somewhat of a misnomer. The auteur theory is not some all encompassing method for evaluating film, but, originally, was a championing of a more personal approach to commercial filmmaking. The auteur theory was a response to a the stultifying "tradition of quality" that dominated the French cinema and was represented by such figures as Marcel Carné, René Clément, Claude Autant-Lara, and Henri Clouzot. In response to this, the Cahiers critics championed European auteurs who they felt offered a more personal and less stuffy vision of cinema such as Renoir, Ophuls, Becker, and Tati. The Cahiers critics also championed Hollywood directors such as Hawks and Hitchcock long before they were recognized as artists in the English speaking world.

Nouvelle Vague does a good job of providing a glimpse into the Cahiers crowd before Godard began shooting Breathless. All of the characters are introduced by titles which proves to be a good shorthand method for introducing the film's large cast. The film also shows Godard following the advice of esteemed film veterans before making his debut. There are wonderful cameos by figures playing Cocteau, Bresson, Melville, and Roberto Rossellini all of whom were venerated by the Cahiers crowd. Linklater's choice of shooting in black and white captures the feel of early New Wave films without mimicking Godard's style. There are no jump cuts or irises like those employed by Godard in Breathless. The editing is brisk and ebullient, fitting for the story of a film which was shot guerrilla style in less than three weeks. 

A number of Linklater's films revolve around a group of individuals who band together due to a common bond: the stoners in Dazed and Confused, the outlaws in The Newton Boys or the jocks of Everybody Wants Some!!. The cast and crew of Breathless are another little band united in a common purpose in this paean to cinephilia. The crew all play their part even when befuddled by the more cryptic pronouncements of the director. Nouvelle Vague displays the crucial contributions of cinematographer Raoul Coutard (Matthieu Penchinat) whose grounded efforts often provided a counterbalance to Godard's airy fancies. The cast are uncanny in their likeness to their real life counterparts and there is no weak link among them. No one quite has the charisma of Belmondo, but Aubry Dullin beautifully personifies his relaxed physicality and bemused demeanor. Guillaume Marbeck captures the intelligence, insolence, and insularity of Godard. The film wisely elides some, but not all, of the less laudatory aspects of his character. We root for him despite his nature because he is young and struggling to be a voice in the world of cinema that is his true love. Best of all is Zoey Deutch who is an uncanny twin of Jean Seberg. Deutch ably displays the steely resolve that lurked beneath Seberg's corn fed Iowa exterior.

Misericordia

Félix Kysyl and Jacques Develay

Alain Guiraudie's Misericordia (in France Miséricorde) is a wry and unsettling murder mystery set in the southern French countryside. The film, scripted by Guiraudie, combines an assortment of elements: a polymorphously perverse figure cons and bedazzles a small circle of patsies with his erotic allure (Teorema), a homophilic attraction and its attendant passion leads to murder (any Patricia Highsmith adaptation) resulting in a corpse being comically underfoot amidst gorgeous fall foliage (The Trouble With Harry). Guiraudie populates his film with a motley array of characters, nearly all harboring a secret or two. Most interesting are a not too grieving widow (Catherine Frot), an equivocal cleric (Jacques Develay), and a protagonist who is the object of desire for all who gaze upon him (Félix Kysyl). Misericordia is nothing earth shaking in terms of film dynamics, but I appreciated its droll aplomb. 

The film is not a whodunit, the audience witnesses the killing, but a will he get away with it.  Misericordia presents a series of mostly two handed dialogues with a constant vying for dominance between the combatants. It is the dialogues between priest and the perp that best display the range of the film, meditations on crime and punishment that limn the heights and depth of the human soul. Ultimately, the film rejects the rationalism of Cartesian dualism to celebrate the comforts of the flesh, while we can. The film's priest offer a rationalization for his moral stand, as a French priest would, but it is eros more than agape that compels him.